| Title |
How reliable are students’ evaluations of teaching quality? A variance components approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083 |
| Authors |
Daniela Feistauer, Tobias Richter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 79 | 52% |
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 54 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 93 | 62% |
| Scientists | 48 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 23% |
| Psychology | 15 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#452,035
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
#20
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,037
of 419,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them