Attributing Cyber Attacks
Journal of Strategic Studies, December 2014
Thomas Rid, Ben Buchanan
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 274 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||237||86%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||8||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 707 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||196||28%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||82||12%|
|Student > Bachelor||65||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||32||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||29||4%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||26||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 442. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strategic Studies
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 362,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strategic Studies
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.