| Title |
Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Engineering Studies, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631 |
| Authors |
Donna Riley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 326 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 98 | 30% |
| Netherlands | 25 | 8% |
| Canada | 12 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Comoros | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 154 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 274 | 84% |
| Scientists | 43 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 28% |
| Professor | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 53 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 294. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#121,903
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Engineering Studies
#1
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,635
of 447,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engineering Studies
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them